Why try IMPT instead of Booking.com or Expedia

An honest case for trying IMPT vs the major OTAs — same hotels, same prices, plus the per-booking carbon offset.

Direct answer

IMPT carries the same hotel inventory and the same nightly rates as the major OTAs. The differentiator: every IMPT booking retires one tonne of UN-verified CO₂ on-chain, funded from IMPT's commission, no surcharge to the guest.

Same hotels

IMPT uses the Gimmonix supplier feed — the same primary feed several other major OTAs use. 1.7M hotels, 195 countries. If a hotel is on Booking.com, it's almost certainly on IMPT.

Same prices

Standard supplier-feed rates. No green premium. No "sustainability fee". Free cancellation on most stays.

Plus the offset

1 tonne of UN-verified CO₂ retired on-chain per booking — 28× the average per-night hotel footprint. IMPT funds it from its commission, so the guest pays the standard nightly rate.

Plus the on-chain receipt

Every booking carries a retirement reference and on-chain transaction hash. Independently verifiable on Ethereum. Suitable for personal carbon dashboards or corporate Scope 3 reporting.

FAQ

Is the price actually the same as Booking.com?

Yes. IMPT uses the same supplier-feed rates. There is no green premium and no sustainability surcharge.

Do I need an IMPT account to book?

Not to search. Account creation is part of the standard booking flow at confirmation, the same as Booking.com or Expedia.

What happens if I cancel?

Free cancellation on most stays — same cancellation policies as the underlying hotel offers. The carbon retirement is associated with the confirmed booking; cancellations don't trigger an unnecessary retirement.

Find your hotel

Live availability across 1.7M hotels — same price as direct, free cancellation on most stays.

Search now →